Let's go here to continue the discussion: http://davesgarden.com/community/forums/t/1412213/
I *think* the issues mentioned here have all been captured in the first post.
Status of Updates & Fixes
Going to the end of the post seems most logical to me, and it is definitely my preference. Being told someone else had posted while I was typing is a nice feature, but seems unnecessary if you automatically go to the end of the post, as you would see the new posts then.
Actually, in my opinion, being told that someone else has posted while I was typing is useful, because there may be comments in those new messages that I want to respond to while I am still working on my message.
In forums on other sites, when I receive a "someone else posted while" message, I open the forum in a second window so that I can read those messages and respond to them in my in-work message, if it seems appropriate.
Actually, ironically, Terry's post occurred while I was still working on my post, without my knowledge.
ZM
This message was edited Dec 23, 2015 1:04 PM
Quote from Cville_Gardener :I still have a backslash before apostrophes on my Home Page. :(
Can you tell me which thread(s) are still showing this?
It's in my list of Latest Threads and in the Plants ID Forum. It was post #10183144.
Quote from Terry :Quote from Cville_Gardener :I still have a backslash before apostrophes on my Home Page. :(
Can you tell me which thread(s) are still showing this?
It's in my list of Latest Threads and in the Plants ID Forum. It was post #10183144.
Strange, but it was definitely a lingering backslash. Do you still see it?
testing
No, I'm not still seeing the backslash.
I had to unwatch and then click watch again to have this forum show up in my watched list. What a PITA.
Why did the programmers change the ability to immediately access the last read post in a thread? Before (and on other sites right now) be taken to the last read post. Now it is required to get into the thread and then click on skip to new. Why is that better than the previous method which required 1 click; now at least 2 are required. Tedious and unnecessary. Was there a reason that has not been explained or that I missed?
Upgrades..............ease of navigation...............modernizing...............take your pick.
Why did the programmers change the ability to immediately access the last read post in a thread? Before (and on other sites right now) be taken to the last read post. Now it is required to get into the thread and then click on skip to new. Why is that better than the previous method which required 1 click; now at least 2 are required. Tedious and unnecessary. Was there a reason that has not been explained or that I missed?
As far as I know, we've always had the two-step process of first clicking on the thread, then skipping to new.
I think it's for your own convenience.
Terry and stillwood ~ I remember it as being a two-step process as long as I've been a member. I actually prefer starting at the beginning of a thread and clicking on "Skip to new".
I Nevr had skip to new, the thread always started at first post, then I had to scroll down for 300 odd posts. I like the paginators but wish it were a top of thread option...
Skip to new has always been here.
I Nevr had skip to new, the thread always started at first post, then I had to scroll down for 300 odd posts. I like the paginators but wish it were a top of thread option...
It was always there at the top of each thread, but a lot of people didn't see it :-).
How come after viewing photos, when you click out of them it takes you back to the BEGINNING of the thread, not to the post where the pix were??? More clicks to get back to where you want to be....................
How come after viewing photos, when you click out of them it takes you back to the BEGINNING of the thread, not to the post where the pix were??? More clicks to get back to where you want to be....................
If you click on "Back to Post" (just above the photo) it will take you right back to the post you were viewing. It requires only one click.
It does say "Back to post" just above the picture and it works..
Perhaps it needs to be in larger type until people get used to it.
This message was edited Dec 31, 2015 3:33 PM
So sad this happened. Lost too many dear friends.
Post a Reply to this Thread
More DG Site Updates Threads
-
Site Update 6/18/2025
started by IBtyen
last post by IBtyenAug 25, 202518Aug 25, 2025 -
Site Update 9/8/2025
started by IBtyen
last post by IBtyenSep 09, 20250Sep 09, 2025 -
Site Update 10/1/2025
started by IBtyen
last post by IBtyenMar 31, 202629Mar 31, 2026 -
DG Site Update 3/23/2026
started by IBtyen
last post by IBtyenMar 23, 20260Mar 23, 2026
