Quote from Terry :In a nutshell, no user names have ever been created by "personnel" here, other than our own. No blocs of names have been created by anyone for any purpose that I am aware of, other than a few isolated incidents of spam attacks, and we've taken great pains to remove those accounts.
...
We do not remove or scrub members from the list for non-activity. Experience has taught us that members sometimes let their accounts lay dormant for a long time before activating them, or they appear to have abandoned their account, only to return years later.
Thanks for your response, Terry. I had already determined from inspection of the member list that there was no evidence of mass or bulk duplicate memberships, and I conceded that in a message to Kell.
" We do not remove or scrub members from the list for non-activity. "
I respect your right to have that policy, although I do not personally agree with it. I guess part of my opinion is based on lingering resentment over not being able to be ZenMan because I thought at the time that it was improbable that another user had that name legitimately. I was wrong. It happens. I am over it. How you manage your membership rolls is totally Dave's Garden's business, and I wish Dave's Garden every success in the future.
Incidentally, I may be in the minority on this, but I like DG's "new look".
ZM
Thanks :-).
