Strange sponge-like blob fungus

Calgary, Canada

These blobs showed up after a rain in our wood mulch. It is coniferous mulch.

Anyone recognize them?

Thumbnail by steelsheep Thumbnail by steelsheep Thumbnail by steelsheep Thumbnail by steelsheep Thumbnail by steelsheep
San Francisco, CA

no fungus here please. this is the *plant* ID forum.

Prairieville, LA(Zone 9a)

It is the same as the RED GOO fungus in your other post. Until recently fungi and plants were in the same group...now they have their own group. This forum and Plant Pests and Diseases would be the most logical place for Non-subscribers to post their questions.

San Francisco, CA

Quote from themoonhowl :
It is the same as the RED GOO fungus in your other post. Until recently fungi and plants were in the same group...now they have their own group. ....


With all respect, Fungi and plants have not been considered one group for some 90 years or more.

Prairieville, LA(Zone 9a)

Actually, Fungi did not receive their own "Kingdom" until 1969 (Robert Whitaker). There had been much conflict within ICBN over it and it was decided that the formation of a third kingdom for fungi was needed. In 1980, a separate Nomenclature Code was established for Bacteria and viruses, the ICNB.

Brunswick, GA

For the record, this stuff is not a fungus -- and it is not in the Plant or Fungus kingdom.

It is Fuligo septica -- Dog Vomit Slime Mold (but nor is it a true mold) -- and it belongs in the same kingdom as an Amoeba.

The yellow mass is actually capable of crawling across the ground surface (like a giant Amoeba) when it first emerges from the soil -- then it hardens in place, releases spores and dies.

San Francisco, CA

Quote from themoonhowl :
Actually, Fungi did not receive their own "Kingdom" until 1969 (Robert Whitaker). There had been much conflict within ICBN over it and it was decided that the formation of a third kingdom for fungi was needed. In 1980, a separate Nomenclature Code was established for Bacteria and viruses, the ICNB.


Fungi were not considered plants even before Cronquist. Who mentioned bacteria and virus?

Austin, TX

Let's ease up a bit, shall we? After all, this is something that was posted for identification. So it must not have been known what it was. Not knowing what it was, we can't expect it to be filed accurately.

As to what kingdom it belongs to, Wikipedia has a good article on the history of the number of kingdoms over time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_%28biology%29
It should be noted that the date something is proposed and it is accepted are not the same.

I recall learning in grade school that there were two kingdoms, plants and animals. Note that when a third kingdom was added, it was distinguished by unicellular organisms, so this one would seem not to qualify.

This is not the state of the art of modern classification, nor the way things are organized here on DG (which is what really matters). But again, at the time of posting, the ID of the organism was not known, so I don't think the post is inappropriate.

Prairieville, LA(Zone 9a)

And neither did I.

Murfreesboro, TN(Zone 7a)

Ahem.

I moved the thread to the Garden Pests and Diseases, which is arguably a better place for it and I've sent a note to the original poster.

Let's all ease up a bit on the technicalities and help this member feel welcome to tap into the helpful and friendly atmosphere DG members are known for providing :-)

(Zone 7a)

I'm not even in on the conversation and I felt the cyber-tension. Here's hoping the original poster will come back.

Austin, TX

Quote from kwanjin :
I'm not even in on the conversation and I felt the cyber-tension. Here's hoping the original poster will come back.


You are now. GRIN

Post a Reply to this Thread

Please or sign up to post.
BACK TO TOP