Here is a seed envelope template, not unlike many designs but with interlocking sides so as to save cutting time.
When I really want a quick envelope I take a legal size envelope, lick it closed and then cut it in half. It's just too bad it doesn't fit in the small bubble envelopes!
If you want other envelopes designs from dave's garden go to the trading primer...link below.
http://davesgarden.com/files/seedpackets/
kayaker, I strongly recommend seed packets with the webbed corners. It really inhibits seed leakage. I not only use this seed package tempalet, but I also use another inner packet of waxed paper to insure the security of seed.
Indeed you could be very right! I guess It wouldn't take too much effort to adjust the design.
Thanks
Good to know, Kayaker. Hope you know how to spell template, because, obviously, I don't!.
I'd never count on my spelling! DG needs a spellcheck feature, if not for anyone else, just for us!
There is a spell check available for Internet Explorer. I find it helpful... when I'm not too lazy to use it! LOL! Here's the thread that mentions it: http://davesgarden.com/forums/t/368794/
Weezingreens,
You seem to have ALL the answers! Does "Dave" have you on his payroll?
Field this question then...
Is there a way to delete unwanted mail from Dave's Garden site?
Brian
I'm not sure what you mean, Brian. Are you referring to email that arrives from DG to your email program or are you referring to Dave's member to member email here in the Garden?
Yes, the member - member email.
We've been posting that question to admin and have not received a definitive answer. Someone mentioned to me that Dave doesn't want to do that because the e-mails belong to 2 people and even though I might consider an item closed, the other party might want to keep it open for future reference. I've asked it there's any way they could set up a feature where we could "dump" the inactives into a separate folder/file. I know mine is getting very cumbersome!
Yes, that would make sense, Sequee, an inactive or old mail file. I can understand Dave's point, since the other party in the mailing could always hit reply and bring it back.
