A propagation experiment

Saint Bonifacius, MN(Zone 4a)

Wallaby with her "rotting tips" made me think of yet another secret I've been keeping under wraps. And now that I have something to report, it's time for the unveiling:

My nepalense var. concolor stem rotted this summer at the soil line. Buds had developed maybe one-eighth normal size. No sighs of sympathy, please. Because . . . would you believe there is a silver lining?

So I had this long stem of fresh healthy plant material, and I decided to try the rooting method that Maxine talked about last year (or was it two years ago). A good portion of the stem had no leaves at all. I opted not to even try that part. (I don't remember why.) I had 8 cuttings total, about 4 inches each. I divided them into two groups (4 each), alternating up the stem so that both groups had an equal number of lower stems and upper stems. One group received no rooting hormone, the other group's stem ends were dipped in .01% IBA talc. The medium is sharp pool filter sand. Then closed up in a clear bag, and kept in as much light as possible, yet without direct sunlight.

Untreated cuttings faired better in all respects. Four stems callused; three of those were untreated. One untreated callused stem developed no further and eventually died. The other two of the untreated callused stems grew roots; one subsequently died, but one is left and is actually growing !!!

On the left side in the pic you can see the healthy cutting with its two original (large) leaves that look like they are fading. The nice green are new leaves. That little one all by its lonesome seemed a bit odd, so I carefully dug to observe its connection to the mother stem. It appears to be connected simply by a long petiole, rather than a stem. Why it decided to travel so far horizontally is a mystery. But I have to say this finding isn't infallible, as the leaf is so dainty that I was afraid to remove too much sand for fear of injury.

Across the divide is (was) the other group of treated cuttings. There is one left. No callus, no roots, original leaves dead, stem dead above the sand, but you can see some tiny new growth. Unfortunately, experience tells me this cutting is doomed, but I always let things go until they actually die. The one callused, treated cutting succumb.

You can disregard the powdery blue cutting. It is just a Salix candida piece that happened to break off recently.

It was dusk when I took this photo, consequently my new camera in regular mode had a tough time focusing accurately. I should have thought to turn on the infrared focusing. It would have been a great opportunity to try it out. But the camera is still very new to me, six days, that's my excuse, and I'm stickin' to it.

Thumbnail by Leftwood
Lincoln, United Kingdom(Zone 8a)

I'm glad my rotting tips gave you a thought Lefty!

L. nepalense does reproduce by running stolons, so I'm thinking that is what your rooted cutting is doing now. The question is, why just this one? My thoughts here are that this one must, or might have been, the most basal cutting of the stem, that is the one with more maturity and thickening of the stem. This could have the necessary hormones under the outer skin, in the cambrian layer, to help it take root. Once rooted of course it then can behave in the normal manner of L. nepalense, it runs!

Now if my L. gloriosoides does the same again next year, I will try to remember to try that! I'm not even sure if it is a stem rooting lily, but if it is then there is a chance. First I will have to try to dig it out of it's pot to see what's up with it, I think it wil be OK, if only having to regrow after it's massive flowering. It had better be!

Keep us informed on this one please!

Saint Bonifacius, MN(Zone 4a)

I didn't keep track as to which cuttings were older or younger. You could be right. So far, this nepalense (the plant, not the cutting) has not "run" underground yet in the four seasons I have had it. A thought has recently occurred to me since some internet talk of same, that some variations thought (or assumed) to be nepalense are actually Lilium prumulinum. My plant seems to fit better as primulinum.

L. primulinum var. burmanicum
http://www.the-genus-lilium.com/images/Lilium/primulinum1.jpg

Mine
http://davesgarden.com/community/forums/fp.php?pid=4155531

I hate to jump to conclusions, but it seems like a no-brainer. (But then, so did my "final" ID, because of another reputable pic that matched so closely.) I think some heavy duty winter research is called for. And I will see what our Arboretum hortucultural library has on it. Besides, primulinum is supposed to be stoloniferous, according to deflorum, but no mention of it in the genus lilium site. The bulb is definitely not stoloniferous, nor does the stem seem to wander.

Post a Reply to this Thread

Please or sign up to post.
BACK TO TOP