I am curious as to the classification system used for the plant files, many of the family designations such as Papilionaceae, Flacourtiaceae, etc. are generally no longer used by taxonomists following modern phylogenetic systems. I know that many people still utilize older classifications like Cronquist (1981), but I think it would be better if Dave's could follow a system that derives its classification from evolutionary relationships (like APG).
Those darn taxonomists
Baa
Apr 23, 2010
The reason why Fabaceae was split is somewhere in the depths of this forum, 2006 that thread was started but whether that still stands, I wouldn't know.
Baa has a good memory ;o)
Here's the thread: http://davesgarden.com/community/forums/t/413338/
More Site Help Threads
-
Closed Native Plant Nurseries
started by CarLLinnaeus
last post by CarLLinnaeusOct 14, 20250Oct 14, 2025 -
Plant problem ID
started by a5footsea
last post by a5footseaNov 25, 20252Nov 25, 2025
